ClaudeChatGPTPerplexityGeminiMicrosoft CopilotRaycastMeta AIGrokZ.aiQwenKimi
DeepSeekMistralCursorVS CodeWindsurfJetBrainsClineLovableVercel AI SDKLangChain

Use Feynman Radical Simplification Prover with your AI.

Connect your account once and let the AI you already use work with it, without building another integration. Stop your AI from hiding behind jargon. force it to explain simply, build from scratch, and justify every piece of complexity.

Included with plan

Ask AI about this Connector

Developed, maintained, and hosted by Vinkius.

MCP VERIFIED · PRODUCTION READY · VINKIUS GUARANTEED

Waiting for input…

Works with modern AI clients that support MCP, including ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, and more.

ChatGPTClaudeCursorPerplexityGeminiMicrosoft CopilotRaycastMeta AI

Complete set · 1 capability

The complete Feynman Radical Simplification Prover capability set.

These are the exact actions your AI can choose when you ask it to work with Feynman Radical Simplification Prover.

Capability set01 / 01

01

1 capability in this set.

Part of 1 available through Feynman Radical Simplification Prover.

  1. 01

    Validate radical simplification

    You must: (1) ELIMINATE JARGON. rewrite the explanation using only words a bright teenager understands. Feynman: "I learned very early the difference between knowing the name of something and knowing something." If you cannot explain it without the technical term, you do not understand it, (2) SIMPLIFY TO CORE. reduce to the ONE mechanism that makes this work. Feynman: QED = 3 actions (a photon goes from place to place, an electron goes from place to place, an electron emits or absorbs a photon). What are YOUR 3 actions? If "it is too complex to simplify," you do not understand it, (3) CONSTRUCT FROM SCRATCH. build the answer step by step from bedrock certainties. Feynman: "What I cannot create, I do not understand." Do not recite. derive. Start from what you know for certain and build to the conclusion, (4) EXPOSE SELF-DECEPTION. identify where you might be fooling yourself. Feynman: "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself. and you are the easiest person to fool." Name your weakest point, your most convenient belief, your blind spot, (5) JUSTIFY COMPLEXITY. prove every layer of complexity earns its place. Feynman on Challenger: O-ring in ice water. One gesture, entire disaster explained. What is YOUR O-ring? Which layers can be removed without losing understanding? If rejected, fix the specific understanding gap the engine identifies. Structured reflection capability that forces Feynman-level radical simplification. The agent must eliminate jargon (knowing the name is not knowing the thing), simplify to the irreducible core mechanism, construct answers from scratch instead of reciting them, expose self-deception ("you are the easiest person to fool"), and justify every layer of complexity (the O-ring test. one gesture should explain the failure). Catches Jargon Hiding (technical terms masking lack of understanding), Simplification Failure (inability to reduce to first principles), Construction Absence (reciting instead of deriving), Self-Deception (convenient beliefs masking weak reasoning), and Unjustified Complexity (layers that add no explanatory power). Call once per explanation, analysis, or recommendation

Observed, not estimated

873ms average. Fast in production.

Feynman Radical Simplification Prover is checked daily against the live service.

Daily averagePeak 1011ms
Aug 20Today
Fastest day
686ms
Slowest day
1011ms
14-day trend
Slowing+18%

Connect your client

One URL. Every client.

Activate the Connector, copy your link, and paste it into the client you already use. 1 capability arrives ready to run.

Preview access · not provider authentication

The vk_preview_* token belongs to Vinkius preview infrastructure. It lets Claude discover and display the capabilities of Feynman Radical Simplification Prover, so you can see the experience inside your AI.

It does not authenticate your account with Feynman Radical Simplification Prover. Actions requiring credentials or live account data may not run until you activate the Connector and authorize the service.

Feynman Radical Simplification Prover Connector

You're all set. Choose your MCP client and follow the setup instructions.

Connector linkhttps://edge.vinkius.com/vk_preview_OTMzj3FrPe8EqyLkYjsAFQapXAlLJ5DLHtLzOXZY/mcp

Claude Desktop

Follow the steps below to connect in seconds.

  1. 1In Claude Desktop, open Settings → Connectors.
  2. 2Click “Add custom connector” and paste the connector link above as the remote MCP server URL.
  3. 3Click Add and start a new chat — Feynman Radical Simplification Prover capabilities are ready to use.
Configuration · claude_desktop_config.jsonCopy
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "feynman-radical-simplification-prover-mcp": {
      "url": "https://edge.vinkius.com/vk_preview_OTMzj3FrPe8EqyLkYjsAFQapXAlLJ5DLHtLzOXZY/mcp"
    }
  }
}
  • Claude
  • ChatGPT
  • Cursor
  • VS Code
  • Windsurf
  • Claude Code
  • JetBrains
  • Cline

Step-by-step instructions for each client are in the guide. How to connect

FAQ

Questions Feynman Radical Simplification Prover owners ask.

  • 01

    Does it generate simplified explanations?

    No. It forces the agent to produce its OWN simplified explanation and then validates consistency. If the agent claims jargon is eliminated but uses 'synergize' or 'paradigm shift,' the engine rejects. The simplification must be genuine. not jargon renamed.

  • 02

    How is this different from the Archimedes First Principles Prover?

    Archimedes DECOMPOSES to fundamentals and derives proofs. Feynman SIMPLIFIES to clarity and exposes self-deception. Archimedes asks: 'what are the axioms?' Feynman asks: 'can you explain this to a teenager?' Archimedes validates logic. Feynman validates understanding.

  • 03

    What is the 'O-ring test'?

    During the Challenger investigation, everyone gave complex testimony. Feynman dropped a rubber O-ring in ice water. It became brittle. One gesture explained the entire disaster. The O-ring test: can you reduce your explanation to ONE thing that makes the failure. or success. obvious? If you cannot, you are hiding behind complexity.