Use Curie Measurement Prover with your AI.
Connect your account once and let the AI you already use work with it, without building another integration. A team shipped a 'significant performance improvement.' Workflow, supplier, automation, and schedule all changed at once. Processing time dropped. but nobody k
Developed, maintained, and hosted by Vinkius.
MCP VERIFIED · PRODUCTION READY · VINKIUS GUARANTEED
Waiting for input…
Works with modern AI clients that support MCP, including ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, and more.
Complete set · 1 capability
The complete Curie Measurement Prover capability set.
These are the exact actions your AI can choose when you ask it to work with Curie Measurement Prover.
01
1 capability in this set.
Part of 1 available through Curie Measurement Prover.
- 01
Validate curie measurement
Think like Marie Curie. who measured what others said could not be measured, isolated variables across thousands of fractions, validated across two entire sciences, persisted for 4 years on a single extraction, and understood risk so well that her notebooks still require lead-lined boxes. You must: (1) MEASURE. specify baseline (current measured value), method (instrument/process), after-value (measured result), and delta (quantified change with percentage). "Significantly better," "improved performance," and "notable improvement" are not measurements, (2) ISOLATE. change ONE variable, control everything else, prove attribution (reversing restores the old result), and verify reproducibility (repeat the experiment, measure variance). "We redesigned the process" is correlation, not causation. Curie tested ONE element at a time, (3) CROSS-VALIDATE. test in multiple contexts (locations, user segments, time periods), under multiple conditions (low demand, peak, stressed, degraded), with multiple data sets (small sample, full population, edge cases). A result that only works in one context is a coincidence, (4) PERSIST. document systematic investigation with specific attempts, measured results per attempt, and duration. "We tried and it failed" after 2 attempts is premature abandonment. Curie: 4 years, 8 tons of pitchblende, 0.1 grams of radium, (5) QUANTIFY RISK. each danger with probability (based on historical data or structured estimation), impact (in currency, time, or scope), and mitigation strategy. "The risk is minimal" is not quantification. If rejected, your claim lacks empirical foundation. Structured reflection capability for Marie Curie-level empirical rigor. replacing qualitative claims with quantitative measurements, isolating variables, cross-validating across contexts, persisting through systematic investigation, and quantifying risks with probability and impact. Catches Measurement Absence ("significantly better" without baseline, method, after-value, and delta. Curie measured radioactivity when others said it was unmeasurable), Isolation Failure (changing 3 variables at once and claiming causation. "we redesigned the process and results improved" without isolating which change drove improvement), Single-Context Validation ("it worked in one test" without varying conditions, populations, scales, or environments. Curie won Nobel Prizes in Physics AND Chemistry, not one lab), Persistence Deficit ("we tried and it failed" after 2 attempts instead of systematic investigation. Curie: 4 years, 8 tons of pitchblende, 0.1 grams of radium), and Risk Handwaving ("the risk is minimal" without probability, impact, and mitigation for each danger. Curie's notebooks are still radioactive after 120 years). Call once per empirical claim, performance assertion, or data-driven recommendation
Observed, not estimated
869ms average. Fast in production.
Curie Measurement Prover is checked daily against the live service.
- Fastest day
- 691ms
- Slowest day
- 1027ms
- 14-day trend
- Slowing+23%
Connect your client
One URL. Every client.
Activate the Connector, copy your link, and paste it into the client you already use. 1 capability arrives ready to run.
Preview access · not provider authentication
The vk_preview_* token belongs to Vinkius preview infrastructure. It lets Claude discover and display the capabilities of Curie Measurement Prover, so you can see the experience inside your AI.
It does not authenticate your account with Curie Measurement Prover. Actions requiring credentials or live account data may not run until you activate the Connector and authorize the service.
Curie Measurement Prover Connector
You're all set. Choose your MCP client and follow the setup instructions.
https://edge.vinkius.com/vk_preview_CPb0xivIrSLYBuuZ7KzsZrT7gj3fFKipKNBJYSPo/mcpClaude Desktop
Follow the steps below to connect in seconds.
- 1In Claude Desktop, open Settings → Connectors.
- 2Click “Add custom connector” and paste the connector link above as the remote MCP server URL.
- 3Click Add and start a new chat — Curie Measurement Prover capabilities are ready to use.
{
"mcpServers": {
"curie-measurement-prover-mcp": {
"url": "https://edge.vinkius.com/vk_preview_CPb0xivIrSLYBuuZ7KzsZrT7gj3fFKipKNBJYSPo/mcp"
}
}
}
Claude
ChatGPT
Cursor
VS Code
Windsurf
Claude Code
JetBrains
Cline
Step-by-step instructions for each client are in the guide. How to connect
FAQ
Questions Curie Measurement Prover owners ask.
- 01
Is this only for performance optimization?
No. Curie's method applies to any domain requiring empirical validation. process improvement (measure before/after cycle times, isolate each change), vendor evaluation (measure cost/quality/reliability, not 'it seems better'), risk assessment (quantify probability and impact, not 'the risk is minimal'), method selection (benchmark each candidate in isolation), controlled experiments (single variable, controlled conditions). Anywhere you would say 'better' or 'faster' or 'more reliable,' replace the adjective with a number.
- 02
What if isolation is impractical?
Sometimes variables are genuinely coupled. changing the supplier requires changing the delivery schedule. The engine does not demand artificial isolation. It demands AWARENESS of what was changed together and WHY isolation was impractical. Document: 'We changed X and Y together because X requires Y. We cannot isolate their effects. We accept that the 67% improvement is from X+Y combined, with Y alone contributing approximately 15% based on a separate controlled test.' Honest documentation of coupled changes is acceptable. Pretending 3 changes are one is not.
- 03
How does it differ from the Watt Efficiency Prover?
Watt validates EFFICIENCY ENGINEERING. finding waste, instrumenting baselines, designing feedback loops, isolating bottlenecks, quantifying improvements. It asks 'where is the bottleneck?' Curie validates EMPIRICAL RIGOR. measuring instead of claiming, isolating variables, cross-domain validation, persistence, risk quantification. It asks 'where is the number?' Watt finds WHERE to optimize. Curie proves THAT you optimized. Use Watt to identify bottlenecks. Use Curie to prove your fix actually worked. with numbers, not adjectives.
Explore
More in Complex Reasoning
Causal-Graph Navigator AI Connector
LLMs reason by statistical proximity, confusing word co-occurrence with direct causal relationships. This tool
ViewEngineering Reasoning Prover AI Connector
An engineering report cited 'industry standards' without naming a single one. Engineering Reasoning Prover for
ViewContract Review Prover AI Connector
AI models summarize contracts instead of analyzing them. This tool forces clause-level rigor: score risk per c
ViewIncident Postmortem Prover AI Connector
Most postmortems fail: vague timelines, symptom-level root causes, and action items with no owner. This tool f
View
Suggestions
Marilyn vos Savant Probabilistic Clarity Prover AI Connector
Stop your AI from trusting its gut — force it to check intuition against actual probability before every concl
ViewArticle Architect AI Connector
Technical blog posts written by AI read like documentation — step 1, step 2, step 3, no argument, no tradeoffs
ViewElon Musk Physics Prover AI Connector
An AI accepted every constraint as given, added layers of complexity, and automated bloated processes. That is
ViewLegal Reasoning Prover AI Connector
A legal memo cited cases that do not exist and confused jurisdiction. Legal Reasoning Prover forces IRAC-based
View
