Use Journalistic Reasoning Prover with your AI.
Connect your account once and let the AI you already use work with it, without building another integration. A report cited three sources. None of them existed. That is not an error � that is fabrication. Journalistic Reasoning Prover forces independent verification, s
Developed, maintained, and hosted by Vinkius.
MCP VERIFIED · PRODUCTION READY · VINKIUS GUARANTEED
Waiting for input…
Works with modern AI clients that support MCP, including ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, and more.
Complete set · 1 capability
The complete Journalistic Reasoning Prover capability set.
These are the exact actions your AI can choose when you ask it to work with Journalistic Reasoning Prover.
01
1 capability in this set.
Part of 1 available through Journalistic Reasoning Prover.
- 01
Validate journalistic reasoning
Journalism is the discipline of verification (Kovach & Rosenstiel). You must: (1) VERIFY every source. name the expert with full affiliation, cite the study with authors/journal/year/DOI. "Experts say" is fabrication, not journalism, (2) CORROBORATE every claim independently. at least two sources. Review primary documents. Consider contradicting evidence. A single-source claim is an allegation, not a verified fact, (3) test BALANCE for authenticity. is this genuine perspective diversity or false equivalence? Weight proportional to evidence. 97-3 evidence does not deserve 50-50 coverage. Fringe identified as fringe, (4) complete ATTRIBUTION. WHO (full name, affiliation), WHEN (date), WHERE (setting), HOW obtained (interview, FOIA, document review) for every quote and statistic, (5) DISCLOSE conflicts. financial, institutional, personal, advertiser. SPJ Code of Ethics: transparency about interests that could shape reporting. If rejected, your content has a journalistic deficiency. Structured reflection capability for journalistic reasoning and fact-checking. forces source verification, independent claim corroboration, authentic balance, complete attribution, and conflict disclosure. Grounded in SPJ Code of Ethics, Kovach & Rosenstiel "Elements of Journalism," and IFCN principles. Catches Source Fabricated (citing unnamed "experts" or "studies" without verifiable attribution. "experts say the market will grow 20%" is fabrication. "Dr. Sarah Chen, Chief Economist at Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, stated in a March 2024 interview that the market will grow 20% based on Q4 employment data" is sourced. "Studies show" and "research indicates" are the signature phrases of unverified claims), Claim Unverified (single-source claims presented as established facts. a single source is an allegation, not a fact. SPJ requires independent corroboration. Primary documents reviewed. Contradicting evidence considered. "Crime is up 40%" requires: source (FBI UCR), methodology (reported vs actual), timeframe (2023 vs 2022), baseline (per capita vs absolute), and at least one independent confirmation), False Balance (giving equal weight to unequal evidence. "some scientists say the Earth is round, while others disagree" is false equivalence. When evidence is 97-3, giving 50-50 coverage misrepresents reality. Genuine balance weighs perspectives proportional to evidence. Fringe positions must be identified as fringe with context for why they are minority views), Attribution Stripped (quotes and statistics without WHO, WHEN, WHERE, HOW. "crime is up 40%" without source, methodology, timeframe, and baseline is assertion, not journalism. Complete attribution: "According to the FBI Uniform Crime Report (2024), violent crime increased 40% between 2019-2023, measured by reported incidents per 100,000 residents, obtained via FOIA request on March 15, 2024"), and Conflict Concealed (undisclosed financial, institutional, or personal interests. SPJ Code: "Disclose unavoidable conflicts." A pharmaceutical company funding a study that shows their drug works is a conflict. An author who holds stock in the company they cover is a conflict. Document absence of conflict as deliberately as presence). Call once per story, report, or factual content
Observed, not estimated
845ms average. Fast in production.
Journalistic Reasoning Prover is checked daily against the live service.
- Fastest day
- 746ms
- Slowest day
- 1040ms
- 14-day trend
- Stable+4%
Connect your client
One URL. Every client.
Activate the Connector, copy your link, and paste it into the client you already use. 1 capability arrives ready to run.
Preview access · not provider authentication
The vk_preview_* token belongs to Vinkius preview infrastructure. It lets Claude discover and display the capabilities of Journalistic Reasoning Prover, so you can see the experience inside your AI.
It does not authenticate your account with Journalistic Reasoning Prover. Actions requiring credentials or live account data may not run until you activate the Connector and authorize the service.
Journalistic Reasoning Prover Connector
You're all set. Choose your MCP client and follow the setup instructions.
https://edge.vinkius.com/vk_preview_xGkY81wXH96naljNRemI9Xxej2x1apAK6AFSdqVF/mcpClaude Desktop
Follow the steps below to connect in seconds.
- 1In Claude Desktop, open Settings → Connectors.
- 2Click “Add custom connector” and paste the connector link above as the remote MCP server URL.
- 3Click Add and start a new chat — Journalistic Reasoning Prover capabilities are ready to use.
{
"mcpServers": {
"journalistic-reasoning-prover-mcp": {
"url": "https://edge.vinkius.com/vk_preview_xGkY81wXH96naljNRemI9Xxej2x1apAK6AFSdqVF/mcp"
}
}
}
Claude
ChatGPT
Cursor
VS Code
Windsurf
Claude Code
JetBrains
Cline
Step-by-step instructions for each client are in the guide. How to connect
FAQ
Questions Journalistic Reasoning Prover owners ask.
- 01
How does the prover prevent source hallucination?
It validates that every factual claim traces to a named, verifiable primary source or study (with authors, journal, and publication year) rather than vague references.
- 02
What journalistic ethics standards does it enforce?
It is grounded in the SPJ Code of Ethics and the Kovach & Rosenstiel verification standards. It forces independent verification across multiple sources and flags false equivalence and conflicts of interest.
- 03
Can it distinguish between opinion and news reporting?
Yes, it assesses attribution, tone, and factual grounding. It flags uncorroborated assertions that are presented as objective news, requiring clear, objective evidence for every claim.
Explore
More in Productivity
Legal Counsel Prover AI Connector
AI agents cite fabricated statutes, ignore deadlines, and deliver one-sided legal memos. This tool forces rigo
ViewFirst Principles Prover AI Connector
LLMs reason by analogy, copying industry norms. This engine is a 6-pivot cognitive trap that forces the agent
ViewPersuasion Copywriting Prover AI Connector
AI copywriting produces generic, robotic text that readers instantly recognize. This tool forces psychological
ViewClinical Reasoning Prover AI Connector
Forces AI to validate clinical treatment plans against US guidelines (AHA, ACC) using real differential exclus
View
Suggestions
Financial Audit Prover AI Connector
Forces AI to ground every financial conclusion in ASC codification, trace numbers to source documents, reconci
ViewFeynman Radical Simplification Prover AI Connector
Stop your AI from hiding behind jargon — force it to explain simply, build from scratch, and justify every pie
ViewArchimedes First Principles Prover AI Connector
An AI recommended restructuring 'because the industry leader does it that way.' That is analogy — not axiom. T
ViewCompetitive Intelligence Prover AI Connector
AI agents fabricate competitor data, list vague weaknesses, propose fantasy strategies, and ignore your own ga
View
