Use SEO Analyst Prover with your AI.

Validate seo analysis

You must: (1) TECHNICAL. crawl efficiency: indexed pages vs expected, orphan pages, CWV scores per template (not site average), redirect chains (max 1 hop), canonical conflicts, rendering issues (JS-dependent content), (2) KEYWORDS. intent mapping (informational/navigational/commercial/transactional), KD vs DA comparison (only target keywords within 20 DA points of #5 result), SERP feature analysis (featured snippets, PAA, video carousels. can you win them?), cannibalization audit (multiple pages targeting same keyword = signal dilution), (3) CONTENT. pillar-cluster architecture (not orphaned pages), internal linking map (every page reachable within 3 clicks), information gain (what does YOUR content offer that existing SERP results do not?), publishing velocity (consistent cadence, not burst-then-silence), (4) BACKLINKS. referring domain count with DA brackets (DA<10 = junk, DA 10-30 = mid, DA 30+ = quality), anchor text distribution (branded 40-60%, exact match <5%, generic 20-30%), toxic ratio (disavow >5% toxic domains), competitor link gap (how many quality links ahead?), (5) COMPETITIVE. share of voice vs top 5 competitors, SERP overlap %, content velocity comparison (are you publishing faster or slower?), DA gap, realistic win list (keywords where you can realistically reach top 5 within 6 months). If rejected, the analysis has a blind spot. address it before executing strategy. Structured reflection capability for expert-level SEO analysis. forces systematic auditing across 5 axes that cover the full SEO diagnostic spectrum. Based on Ahrefs/SEMrush audit methodologies, Google Search Console data patterns, and enterprise SEO frameworks for sites with 10K+ pages. Catches Crawl Amnesia (no technical audit of crawl efficiency. Google Search Console shows 85,000 pages indexed. The site has 12,000 actual content pages. 73,000 phantom pages: faceted navigation (/products?color=red&size=M&sort=price. 4 colors × 5 sizes × 3 sorts = 60 combinations per product × 500 products = 30,000 faceted URLs), paginated archives (/blog/page/2 through /blog/page/847), parameter variations (?utm_source=... ?ref=... ?sessionid=...). Google spends 85% of its crawl budget on junk pages. The 12,000 real pages are crawled every 45 days instead of every 3 days. Fix: robots.txt disallow faceted URLs, canonical to non-parameterized versions, noindex on paginated archives beyond page 5, parameter handling in Search Console. Result: crawl budget reclaimed → important pages crawled 15x more frequently), Keyword Vanity (targeting impossible keywords. Site DA: 22. Target keyword: "project management software". KD 78. Top 5 results: Asana (DA 92), Monday.com (DA 89), Trello (DA 91), Jira (DA 93), ClickUp (DA 84). Probability of ranking in top 10 with DA 22: approximately 0%. Time invested: 6 months of content creation targeting this keyword. Result: page 7. Alternative: "project management for construction teams". KD 18, 2,400 searches/month. Top 5: DA 35-55 sites. Rankable within 3 months. Revenue potential: 2,400 × 3.2% CTR × 4.5% conversion × $49/mo = $170/month from ONE keyword. Rule: only target keywords where YOUR DA is within 20 points of the #5 result. DA 22 → target KD < 35. Win 50 long-tail keywords before chasing head terms), Topical Shallowness (individual pages without pillar-cluster architecture. The site has 40 blog posts about "project management". but no structure. 40 orphaned pages competing with each other for the same keyword cluster. Google cannot determine which page is the authority. so it ranks NONE of them. This is keyword cannibalization: 5 pages target "agile project management". each splits signals (backlinks, clicks, time-on-page) across 5 URLs instead of concentrating on 1. Fix: pillar page "/project-management/agile" (3,000 words, comprehensive). Cluster pages: "/project-management/agile/daily-standup", "/...agile/sprint-planning", etc. Internal linking: every cluster page links to pillar, pillar links to all clusters. Result: Google sees topical authority → ranks the pillar for head term, clusters for long-tail), Backlink Blindness (ignoring link profile quality and competitor gap. Site has 1,200 referring domains. "Great link profile!" Analysis: 800 are directory listings (DA < 10, no traffic). 200 are forum signatures and blog comments (nofollow, zero value). 150 are foreign-language spam sites (toxic. Google penalty risk). 50 are legitimate editorial links (DA 30+, relevant, dofollow). Effective link profile: 50 quality referring domains, not 1,200. Competitor: 3,200 referring domains. 400 are DA 40+ editorial links. Link gap: competitor has 8x more quality links. Priority: disavow 150 toxic domains (penalty prevention), then build 20 editorial links/quarter through original research, data studies, and expert commentary), and Competitive Vacuum (analyzing SEO in isolation, without competitive context. "Our organic traffic grew 15% this quarter!" Competitor A grew 42%. Competitor B grew 28%. The market grew 35%. You grew 15% in a market growing 35%. you LOST market share. Share of Voice: you rank for 340 keywords in top 10. Competitor A: 1,200 keywords. Competitor B: 890 keywords. SERP overlap: you compete with Competitor A on 180 keywords. they outrank you on 165 of them. Without competitive context: "15% growth" feels like success. With competitive context: you are falling behind at an accelerating rate. Action: identify the 50 keywords where competitor ranks #4-#10 but you are #11-#20. these are winnable with content updates and 5-10 quality backlinks each). Call once per SEO strategy, site audit, or competitive analysis