Counterfactual-Variant ProverをAIに接続

• 01 / 03推論を検証する
• 02 / 03回答バイアスの検出し方
• 03 / 03論理パズルの検証方法

最速日

619ms

最遅日

973ms

14日間の傾向

遅延傾向+10%

Counterfactual-Variant Prover Connector

準備完了です。MCPクライアントを選択し、セットアップ手順に従ってください。

コネクタリンクhttps://edge.vinkius.com/vk_preview_DsoSPwZEWSeSBTBSQCX8U58BqAbjy82WIsWBk6Wg/mcpコピー

Claude Desktop

以下の手順で数秒で接続できます。

1. 1In Claude Desktop, open Settings → Connectors.
2. 2Click “Add custom connector” and paste the connector link above as the remote MCP server URL.
3. 3Click Add and start a new chat — Counterfactual-Variant Prover capabilities are ready to use.

設定 · claude_desktop_config.jsonコピー

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "counterfactual-variant-prover-mcp": {
      "url": "https://edge.vinkius.com/vk_preview_DsoSPwZEWSeSBTBSQCX8U58BqAbjy82WIsWBk6Wg/mcp"
    }
  }
}

• Claude
• ChatGPT
• Cursor
• VS Code
• Windsurf
• Claude Code
• JetBrains
• Cline

各クライアントの手順ガイドはこちらです。 接続方法

Claude向けのガイド付きセットアップ？ Counterfactual-Variant ProverをClaudeや他のAIに設定する

このConnectorが対応するすべてのAIクライアントを見る ↑

• 01

  AIエンジニア

  LLMの推論バイアスを特定し、モデルの信頼性を評価する開発者。

• 02

  データサイエンティスト

  ベンチマークテストにおいて、モデルが単なるパターンマッチングを行っていないか検証する専門家。

• 03

  AIリサーチサイエンティスト

  モデルの認知的な脱汚染や、第一原理に基づいた推論プロセスの構築を研究する研究者。

• 01

  What is recitation bias in AI?

  Recitation bias happens when an AI recognizes a famous problem and provides the standard answer from its training data, even if you changed the rules or variables in your prompt.

• 02

  How does this MCP stop an AI from cheating?

  It forces the agent to go through a structured process of variable isolation and rule mapping, making it impossible to jump straight to a memorized conclusion without being flagged.

• 03

  Which AI clients can use this MCP?

  You can use this with any MCP-compatible client, including Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

• 04

  Do I need to host this myself?

  No, Vinkius hosts and manages the MCP for you. You just connect it once and it is ready to use.

• 05

  Can this capability solve any math problem?

  It is specifically designed for problems where there is a risk of the model relying on memorized patterns, such as modified logic puzzles or classic math riddles.

• 06

  How does Counterfactual-Variant Prover stop recitation bias?

  By introducing structural friction. When an agent is forced to fill a schema requiring explicit separation of variables, mapping of differences, and step-by-step logic, it cannot rely on automatic token generation. The capability rejects any attempt to skip these steps or leak classic parameters.

• 07

  What happens if a puzzle has no classic equivalent?

  If no classic signature is detected, the model sets recitationSignatureDetected to false, maps variables, and solves it. However, if the text contains keywords of known puzzles (e.g. Monty Hall, Cheryl), the engine enforces the full counterfactual check to avoid semantic traps.

• 08

  Can it be used alongside other reasoning provers?

  Yes. It works as an orthogonal check. While the Critical Thinking Prover checks overall cognitive quality, the Counterfactual-Variant Prover focuses specifically on variable isolation and preventing memorization loops in logic and mathematics.

• 

  First Principles Prover AIコネクタ

  LLMs reason by analogy, copying industry norms. This engine is a 6-pivot cognitive trap that forces the agent

  表示
• 

  Critical Thinking Prover AIコネクタ

  AI agents accept premises without questioning, analyze from one perspective, cherry-pick evidence, ignore cons

  表示
• 

  Archimedes First Principles Prover AIコネクタ

  An AI recommended restructuring 'because the industry leader does it that way.' That is analogy — not axiom. T

  表示
• 

  Deep Analyst Prover AIコネクタ

  AI gives surface analysis — restates the question, misses hidden assumptions, uses single-lens thinking. This

  表示

おすすめ

• 

  Engineering Reasoning Prover AIコネクタ

  An engineering report cited 'industry standards' without naming a single one. Engineering Reasoning Prover for

  表示
• 

  TypeScript Excellence Prover AIコネクタ

  AI agents produce unsafe TypeScript loaded with `any` types, @ts-ignore overrides, empty catch blocks, and eve

  表示
• 

  Legal Reasoning Prover AIコネクタ

  A legal memo cited cases that do not exist and confused jurisdiction. Legal Reasoning Prover forces IRAC-based

  表示
• 

  Code Integrity Prover AIコネクタ

  AI agents default to type evasion (like any, void*, unsafe, or ignore), TODO stubs, timing/sleep hacks, and em

  表示