#Unit Economics MCP Servers

A pitch deck said '1% of a $10B market' and 'run Facebook ads.' That is not a startup. That is a PowerPoint. This tool forces it to prove behavioral pain, calculate bottom-up TAM, show cohort retention, build a $0 CAC moat, and model unit economics that recycle capital in under 12 months.

A board received an AI-generated forecast: hockey stick J-curve with 90% margins and zero CAC expansion. It says 'we can always raise' as a runway strategy. It scales headcount before product-market fit. That is not financial strategy. That is a bonfire. This tool forces five CFO-level financial axes: unit economics, runway discipline, capital allocation, scenario forecasting, and risk mitigation.

An AI built a pitch deck that claimed a '$4.2B TAM' with no source, described the problem as 'everyone struggles with this,' showed '15K downloads' as traction with 3% D30 retention, and asked for 'funding to accelerate growth'. No amount, no use of funds, no milestones. The deck got rejected in 8 minutes. This tool forces problem validation with evidence, sourced market sizing, defined unit economics, retention-based traction, and a specific fundraising ask.

An AI recommended '$29/month per seat' because that is what three competitors charge. No value metric analysis. Seat count has nothing to do with value delivered. No WTP research. The price was copied, not discovered. No segmentation. Enterprise pays the same as a 3-person startup. No unit economics. CAC was $380 and LTV at $29/month with 14-month retention was $406. LTV/CAC of 1.07x. The company grew revenue 12% while burning 40% of cash on acquisition. This tool forces value metric definition, WTP research, segment pricing, unit economics, and packaging design.